Saturday, August 11

Bang, zoom, straight to the moon!

In Michael Ignatieff’s recent mea culpa , not only does he acknowledge that he was wrong about the Iraq invasion but he reveals a humility that has endeared so many Canadian voters — not. Peppering his earlier paragraphs with quotes from the philosopher Isaiah Berlin, he faults his error in judgment on the academic’s propensity to view the world through ideas and knowledge rather than simple understanding of reality. This convoluted explanation of the difference between the intellectual and politician serves as some kind of proof that he has rappelled the walls of his ivory tower to embrace the simplicity of thought of the common man. And who better to represent that common man than Ralph Kramden!

“As a former denizen of Harvard, I’ve had to learn that a sense of reality doesn’t always flourish in elite institutions. It is the street virtue par excellence. Bus drivers can display a shrewder grasp of what’s what than Nobel Prize winners. The only way any of us can improve our grasp of reality is to confront the world every day and learn, mostly from our mistakes, what works and what doesn’t. Yet even lengthy experience can fail us in life and in politics. Experience can imprison decision-makers in worn-out solutions while blinding them to the untried remedy that does the trick.”

The “bus driver” has a shrewder grasp of reality because he bumbles along in life and picks up a few “what’s what” by learning from mistakes. You have to wade through some 15 or 16 paragraphs that grapple with the obstacles faced by politicians and the challenges of dealing with Iraq before Ignatieff actually and clearly acknowledges that he was wrong because others were less wrong. Those who were against the Iraq invasion were too common and simple to know they were right!?! How else can we interpret this:

“We might test judgment by asking, on the issue of Iraq, who best anticipated how events turned out. But many of those who correctly anticipated catastrophe did so not by exercising judgment but by indulging in ideology. They opposed the invasion because they believed the president was only after the oil or because they believed America is always and in every situation wrong.”

Ignatieff’s so-called apology is pompous and self-serving. In the paragraph that follows, he basically calls those who demonstrated good judgment callous cynics who didn’t suppose the human rights ideals that fueled his own belief that a free state could arise on the foundations of 35 years of police terror. His vision and good intentions, like those of Bush and such honourable Iraqi exiles as Ahmed Chalabi, were his failings? Ignatieff and his fellow neo-conservative pundits do owe an apology for defending and boosting the Bush administration’s ridiculous and illegal plans to liberate Iraq by bringing ruin and insecurity to a nation that had not posed any threat to the US or its allies.

Ignatieff might learn a thing or two about the common man by renting The Honeymooners on DVD. Robert Svedi had this to say about the appeal of this television classic:

“Another reason for The Honeymooners long shelf life is that the problems that the Kramden's and the Norton's faced some fifty years ago, are the same problems that still plague people today. Money shortages, being stuck in a dead-end job, housing and relationship issues and the desire to better one's condition are all things that are dealt with on a daily basis for most of the population every day. The Honeymooners allow us to laugh at ourselves while teaching us that the most valuable commodities are really love and friendship.”

Jackie Gleason’s bus driver has more insight into the human condition than this wannabe Prime Minister.


At 9:12 p.m., Blogger Godammitkitty said...

Excellent post, BY. Ralph Kramden--that's poifect ;)

I've always felt that Thomas Friedman returns to this random-common-man well a little too often. There's always some 'cabbie in Bangalore' who happens to think outsourcing/globalisation is the best thing that ever happened to India, or some retail-clerk in China who's just aching to work 18h days to taste the glorious fruits of hyper-capitalism.

It's all so smarmy and nauseating. And yet these gyus are on teevee and occupying valuable column-inches in the 'paper of record.' :(

I wonder if Iggy's ever watched a minute of the Honeymooners. Wonder if it would fall under 'torture lite' or whatever he's calling it these days.


At 9:34 p.m., Blogger Beijing York said...

GDK, you are so right (no pun intended) about the neo-con free marketeers pulling out random-common-man quotes from the southern hemisphere. They have no shame.

At 2:32 p.m., Anonymous Anonymous said...

Nice to see you back to work on this blog Cristina. Very nicely written article.

I suspect Iggy has a wonderful grasp of human nature. He is just reflecivly dishonest. He ain't confused, he's just a damn liar.wzsthdy

At 3:58 p.m., Blogger The Mound of Sound said...

You so need to repost this, today. So, if you opposed the conquest you were either anti-American or believed it was all about oil. It never would have dawned on anyone that it was illegal without Security Council sanction or that it was illegal because Iraq posed no threat to the United States or any other country and Hans Blix' inspectors knew there were no WMDs.

What arrogance.

At 4:05 p.m., Blogger ml johnstone said...

WOW! You go girl!!


Post a Comment

<< Home